Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Parashat Taz'ree'a - Met'zor'a


This week’s portion – or, more accurately, two portions that are read together, Taz’ree’ah and Metzo’rah – seems, at first site, not like the most interesting of reading material: a detailed, somewhat arduous account of ordinances, laws, and requirements relating to almost every aspect of every bodily ailment – from bad skin condition to pure leprosy.  But, as was the case in other portions, a somewhat deeper examination reveals some extremely thought-provoking insights.  In this post I want to discuss three in particular.   

What’s in a Name? A Word About Portion Titles

The title of the two portions tells us something about their subject matter.  Taz’ree’ah – the title of the first of today’s two portions – is a word related to seed or sperm; in today’s context, it reads something in the vicinity of “whenever a woman becomes pregnant, she should [do the following…]” (Lev. 12:1-2). Most translations understandably took the easy route here, simply reading the text as whenever “a woman gives birth,” or whenever “a woman is with a child,” or, closer still, whenever “a woman who has conceived seed.”  Only one translation of the eleven I examined, the Douay-Rheims Bible, chose to confront the Hebrew original head-on by writing: “If a woman having received seed shall bear a [male] child… [then she should]” (they actually used “man-child,” a term I cannot accept).  In any event, the first portion begins with pregnancy – the point of departure for every human life.   

And indeed, this week’s portion – as any other portion – is named after the first meaningful word in the opening section.  By “Meaningful” I do not mean that it has a meaning – all words in the bible do; rather, it is meaningful in the sense that it is not a part of the formal introduction to the portion (as in “So said God,” or “Then God has spoken,” or, more to the point in this week’s portion: “And God spoke to Moshe and told him:  Tell the children of Israel to do the following”). What is interesting to note, however, is that the first of these meaningful words, this week, is not Taz’ree’ah, but rather “a woman” [“Ee’shah”].

Despite that, the sages chose not to name this portion, as it should have been called, “a woman,” but rather the much more convoluted term “Taz’ree’a.”  That is unfortunate.  Just imagine for a second what an important contribution a portion named “woman” can make to women’s rights and status in Judaism. Just consider the annual cause for celebration, discussion, and reflection on that day for (at least) half of the persons who are Jewish, merely because of the portion’s name.

And while it is true that in Judaism today, once the Sanhedrin ceased to exist, the formal authority to make such serious revisions – as re-naming a portion – is gone, one could make the argument that individual communities, should they so desire, may mark this week by naming the portion in public “Woman.” We should echo, therefore, Juliet’s question to her Romeo – “what’s in a name?” – and answer it anew today: Much is in a name. Let us properly restore it.

The title of the second portion – Me’tzorah, which means a leper – also tells us something about this week’s content.  In the lowest level of abstraction, reading the text as plainly as possible, both portions deal heavily with skin diseases in different stages of evolvement.  Perhaps that was a frequent condition in the desert, requiring an elaborated set of ordinances (with the priests in the role of physicians).  But perhaps there is something deeper here.  That would be the issue of my second point today.

The All-Encompassing Aspect of Judaism 

About twenty years ago, the Israeli Supreme Court was heavily divided around a major jurisprudential (=legal philosophy) issue:  Is the law ubiquitous? Is the law everywhere, all the time, all around us, whenever we go?  Or does the law have a limited role, intervening in our lives only when we do (or attempt to do) something wrong?  One side of the debate was presented by the Vice Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, a noted Torah scholar and a prolific jurist, Justice Menachem Elon. He vehemently opposed the idea of “the law is everything.” To him, (and I cite from memory, twenty years after the fact), “the law has nothing to say about love, dancing, playing with my grandchildren, and many other activities. The law is not everywhere, and the law is not everything.” 

On the other end of the debate, however, stood Aharon Barak, then an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and later Israel’s most famous Chief Justice (think of Chief Justice Marshall for comparison).  Even then, there was no dispute about Barak’s legal brilliance.  To him, (and again, citation from memory only) “the law is not everything, but it is everywhere; everything can be examined through a legal lens.” The fact that we can “dance, love, and play with our children,” Barak explained, exists only because “the law allows it.”  More concretely, “the law sometimes allows, sometimes restricts, but is always there.” Thus, at times the law chooses to intervene through restrictions (“You shall not murder”; “You shall not steal” etc.), and sometimes through leaving “blank spaces” in the regulation map (such as “in relationship, do whatever you want to do [as long as you don’t violate the law otherwise (such as attacking your partner)]”). 

The debate was never firmly resolved.  But reading this week’s portion and thinking of the debate between these two giants – the noted Torah scholar on the one hand and the brilliant jurist on the other – it seems that the Torah itself leans towards the latter (the jurist), at least in its perspective on Jewish law.

Indeed, this week’s portions take us through a long journey of human life (“life cycle” in modern parlance) - and not necessarily the most esthetically pleasing portions of it: skin conditions, ailments, rashes, and the like. (To be exact, the portions take us through the legal rules or decrees we have to follow whenever we encounter such conditions). From post-pardom irth “impurity”; from circumcision (an eighth-day decree that the Rambam himself emphasizes comes from this portion and not from the elaborate discussion in Genesis on the Compact between Avraham and God; see Leviticus 12:3) to a variety of skin diseases in all shapes and sizes; from hair and beard infections to baldness; from contaminated clothes (and proper rules of laundry) to leprosy; from women’s menstrual cycle to men’s inadvertent semen discharge – and many, many, more.

While tedious at times, this legal journey is fascinating in the sense that it shows, on the one hand, the ubiquity of the rules of Judaism – how it may govern every aspect of our lives, from birth to death and everything in between.  But it also makes another important point, which often escapes theological observers, especially non-religious ones – and that is the subject of my third and last point today.        

What Religion Truly Is

When we talk about religion – every religion, but ours most especially – we usually think of very spiritual, dignified settings:  Shabbat Dinner; Shul Prayers; Reflections on God; Celebrating the Holidays (and realizing they are “holy” days); etc. Very few people, I would venture to guess, think about issues such as women’s cycle, skin diseases, proper laundry rules, and others when asked “what religion means to you.”  This week’s portion, however, makes the very profound point that religion – every religion, but ours most especially – in not only about those unique and glorious moments in life, but also – and perhaps mostly – about every single moment in life, from cradle to grave, and everything in between. Thus, when a person receives upon themselves the obligation of religion – the yoke of Torah and Mitzvot – they are placing an enormous responsibility on their lives: It is the responsibility to live and act like a Jewish person at all times.

The Shulchan Aruch, one of Judaism’s profound documents, demonstrates this point beautifully when it begins with the description of what a Jewish person should do immediately upon awakening every single morning (to overcome [his desire to go back to sleep] “like a lion” and to go out and serve his God by prayer [Shacharit]), all the way through going to sleep again. Indeed, the laws of Judaism are all around us, all the time – not only when we light the Shabbat candles.

That is the message of this week’s portion.

Shabbat Shalom,

Doron



No comments:

Post a Comment